Francisco
Santos Leal
Universidad de Cantabria
Classification of empty 4-simplices, part 2
Abstract.
This talk is related to the one I gave in February in this same seminar, but it will be self-contained and largely non-overlapping with part 1. I will report on joint work (partially in progress) with O. Iglesias and M. Blanco, aimed at completing the full classification of empty 4-simplices. An empty simplex is a lattice d-polytope with no other lattice point than its d+1 vertices. They are the âbuilding-blocksâ of lattice polytopes, in the sense that every lattice polytope can be triangulated into empty simplices, and they are also important in algebraic geometry since they correspond to the âterminal singularitiesâ that arise in minimal model programs. The complete classification of empty 3-simplices was done by White (1964), but in dimension 4 only partial results were known so far. Our approach relies on the recent complete classification of lattice hollow 3-polytopes by Averkov, Krumpelmann and Weltge and follows the following scheme: 1) empty 4-simplices of width 1 form a 3-parameter family quite easy to classify, Ă la White. (To relate this to what follows, observe that these empty 4-simplices are the ones that project to a hollow 1-polytope Q, the unit segment). 2) empty 4-simplices of width at least three are finitely many and we have classified them completely by proving an explicit upper bound of 5058 for their (normalized) volume and by enumerating all empty 4-simplices up to that bound. There are 179 of width three and a single one of width four. 3) empty 4-simplices of width two come in three types: 3.1) Those that project to a hollow 2-polytope Q. Since Q itself must have width at least two, it must be the second dilation of a unimodular triangle. We show that empty 4-simplices projecting to it form two 2-parameter families. 3.2) Those that project to a hollow 3-polytope Q, but not to a hollow 2-polytope. We show that, apart of finitely many exceptions for P (with volume bounded by 100) Q is necessarily a triangular bipyramid. Looking at the AKW classification we find out that there are exactly 52 possibilities for Q. Each of them corresponds to an infinite 1-parameter family of hollow 4-simplices, which contains either none or infinitely many empty 4-simplices. We are working on deciding which is the case for each of them (current status is 3 produce none, 38 produce infinitely many, and 11 are still open). 3.3) Those that do not project to a hollow 3-polytope. These are finitely many and we are trying to classify them along the same lines of case (2), except our current volume bounds are not good enough to certify that we have a complete classification. As a by-product, we confirm the classification of âstable quintuplesâ conjectured by Mori, Morrison and Morrison (1989) and proved by Bober (2009). In our language, these quintuples correspond to the infinite families of empty 4-simplices that project to a *primitive* lower dimensional hollow polytope Q (meaning that vertices of Q integer-affinely span the lattice). These include the 3-parameter family of case (1), one of the two 2-parameter families of case (3.1), and 29 of the 52 1-parameter families of case (3.2). The other 1 + 23 families have to be considered new ânon-primitive stable quintuplesâ.